Mcgovern Fraser Commission Ap Gov

The McGovern-Fraser Commission: Reshaping the Democratic Party and the Nomination Process

The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago remains a tumultuous chapter in American political history. Images of police clashing with anti-war protesters, alongside the contested nomination of Hubert Humphrey, fueled a deep sense of crisis within the Democratic Party. This unrest directly led to the creation of the McGovern-Fraser Commission, a pivotal body tasked with reforming the party's nomination process. Understanding the commission's work is crucial for grasping the evolution of American presidential primaries and the enduring impact on party organization and representation. This article delves into the commission's mandate, its recommendations, and their lasting legacy on the Democratic Party and the broader American political landscape.

The Backdrop to Reform: 1968 and the Crisis of Legitimacy

The 1968 convention exposed deep fissures within the Democratic Party. The Vietnam War deeply divided the party, with anti-war activists clashing with the establishment wing. Furthermore, the nomination process itself lacked transparency and seemed to favor party elites over ordinary voters. Hubert Humphrey, who secured the nomination despite not competing in a single primary, symbolized this disconnect. Many felt the nomination process was undemocratic and unresponsive to the concerns of grassroots activists and minority groups. The violence in Chicago further fueled this perception of a party out of touch with its base. This crisis of legitimacy directly triggered calls for significant reform.

The McGovern-Fraser Commission: Mandate and Membership

In response to the 1968 convention's failings, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) established the McGovern-Fraser Commission in 1969. Its primary mandate was to reform the party's presidential nominating process to make it more open, democratic, and representative. The commission was named after its co-chairs, Senator George McGovern, a prominent anti-war liberal, and Representative Donald Fraser, a more moderate figure from Minnesota. This diverse leadership reflected the commission's aim to bridge the party's internal divisions.

The commission was comprised of 38 members, representing a broad spectrum of the Democratic Party, including various ideological factions, geographic regions, and demographic groups. This inclusive approach aimed to ensure that the reform process would address the concerns of all segments of the party. The commission conducted extensive hearings and consultations across the country, gathering input from party activists, voters, and experts on political science. This participatory process was crucial in ensuring the legitimacy and broad acceptance of the commission’s eventual recommendations.

Key Recommendations of the McGovern-Fraser Commission

The McGovern-Fraser Commission's report, issued in 1970, contained a series of sweeping recommendations designed to fundamentally alter the Democratic Party's nomination procedure. The most significant changes focused on enhancing the role of ordinary party members and increasing the representation of traditionally marginalized groups. These key reforms included:

• Increased Proportionality: The commission recommended a proportional representation system for delegates to the national convention. This meant that the number of delegates allocated to each state would reflect the proportion of the vote received by each candidate in that state's primary election or caucus. This move directly challenged the winner-take-all system that had previously concentrated power in certain states and regions.

• Open Primaries and Caucuses: The commission advocated for open primaries and caucuses, where registered voters (regardless of party affiliation in some states) could participate in the selection of delegates. This dramatically increased participation and gave a voice to a wider range of party members, moving away from the previous system where delegate selection was often controlled by party insiders.

• Affirmative Action: Recognizing the historical underrepresentation of women and minorities in the party, the commission mandated affirmative action measures to ensure that delegates more accurately reflected the demographic diversity of the party. This involved setting quotas and targets for the representation of women and minorities at all levels of the party structure, from local caucuses to the national convention.

• Increased Delegate Participation: The commission expanded the role of delegates in the nomination process. They were given greater autonomy in deciding how to vote, reducing the influence of party bosses and national committee members. This empowerment significantly shifted the balance of power within the party.

• Enhanced Transparency and Accountability: The commission’s reforms included measures to increase transparency in the delegate selection process. Detailed records were required, and mechanisms for challenging delegate selections were established. This enhanced accountability aimed to ensure a fair and impartial process.

Impact and Legacy of the McGovern-Fraser Reforms

The McGovern-Fraser Commission's reforms had a profound and lasting impact on the Democratic Party and the American political system as a whole. The changes implemented after the commission’s recommendations fundamentally altered the dynamics of presidential nominations.

• Rise of the Primary System: The reforms significantly strengthened the role of primary elections in the nomination process. Candidates now needed to actively campaign in primaries across numerous states, winning the support of ordinary voters to gain delegates. This shifted power away from party elites towards the electorate, making campaigns more democratic and engaging.

• Increased Voter Participation: The open primary system, alongside proportionality, attracted increased participation from voters. More people felt their voice mattered, as their vote directly influenced the outcome of the nomination contest.

• Greater Diversity within the Party: The affirmative action measures resulted in a significant increase in the representation of women and minorities within the Democratic Party. Delegates at the national convention increasingly reflected the diversity of the American population, leading to more inclusive policy discussions.

• Impact on Campaign Strategies: The changed nomination process fundamentally reshaped campaign strategies. Candidates had to appeal to a broader range of voters across different states, necessitating a national campaign organization and a significant fundraising effort. This led to the professionalization of campaign management and the increased importance of media coverage.

• Impact on Party Organization: The reforms spurred internal party restructuring, leading to a more decentralized and bottom-up organization. The increased role of state and local party organizations in the delegate selection process strengthened their influence within the party.

• Long-Term Consequences: While the McGovern-Fraser reforms were intended to democratize the nomination process, they also had unintended consequences. The rise of primaries led to longer and more expensive campaigns, potentially favoring candidates with greater access to funding and media attention. The increased focus on appealing to a broad base could sometimes dilute party platforms, forcing candidates to adopt more centrist positions.

Criticism and Challenges

Despite its positive impacts, the McGovern-Fraser reforms weren't without criticism. Some argued that the proportional representation system led to protracted and divisive primaries, as candidates needed to win small percentages of the vote in numerous states to secure enough delegates. This could lead to situations where no candidate achieved a majority, making the nomination process more unpredictable.

Others criticized the open primary system, arguing that it allowed members of other parties to influence the Democratic nomination process. This concern highlights the inherent tension between party inclusivity and the need for internal cohesion. The affirmative action measures also faced some criticism, with some suggesting that they were overly prescriptive and potentially led to the selection of delegates based on demographic characteristics rather than their political qualifications.

Conclusion: A Lasting Legacy of Reform

The McGovern-Fraser Commission's legacy remains powerful today. Its reforms fundamentally transformed the Democratic Party and, more broadly, the American presidential nomination process. While there are ongoing debates about the effects of some of the specific changes, it's undeniable that the commission's work dramatically increased the democratic nature of the process. It gave a greater voice to ordinary voters, enhanced the representation of diverse groups within the party, and ushered in a more transparent and accountable system for selecting presidential candidates. The principles of proportionality, open participation, and affirmative action, central to the commission's recommendations, continue to shape the American political landscape, reminding us of the enduring impact of the 1968 crisis and the significant reforms it engendered. The story of the McGovern-Fraser Commission serves as a powerful example of how a response to political crisis can lead to lasting and meaningful change in the American political system. It's a testament to the power of grassroots activism and the importance of striving for a more representative and inclusive democracy.